Program Overview
Twenty years ago, the Big Darby Accord marked a groundbreaking commitment to protect one of Ohio’s most ecologically significant waterways while guiding responsible regional growth. The Big Darby Creek, a Scenic River that is home to extraordinary fish and mussel diversity despite covering just one percent of the state’s land area, has long been a symbol of how cross-sector collaboration can conserve valuable natural resources. Today, two decades after the original Accord, development pressures are rising and there is a new cohort of professionals who are involving in planning and managing the Big Darby Creek watershed. Therefore, it's a critical time for a retrospective. At this program, we will revisit the original inspiration for the Big Darby Accord and the hard-earned lessons for management and planning that have been accumulated along the way.
This Environmental Professionals Network program is not about shaping policy. It is about reconnecting with the stories, values, and vision that shaped the original 2006 Accord. The panel will share firsthand experiences from those who helped craft the original agreement, revealing how scientists, planners, homebuilders, and conservationists worked together to balance myriad interests and values. We will revisit pivotal moments—from early biodiversity discoveries to the tensions surrounding a failed proposal to make the Big Darby a National Wildlife Refuge—and explore why collaboration remains essential today.
Agenda
9:00 a.m. Doors open at Ohio State 4-H Center; Coffee served for in-person attendees.
9:30 a.m. Livestreaming service begins for virtual attendees. Tim Haab, PhD, Director, OSU School of Environment and Natural Resources (SENR), provides welcome remarks.
9:35 a.m. Event moderator Kristy Meyer, CEO & Founder, Upriver Consulting, outlines program themes, including a note on the significant social and ecological complexities that underly management decisions in the Big Darby Creek watershed.
9:40 a.m. Anthony Sasson and John Tetzloff, Darby Creek Association, detail the ecological significance of the Big Darby Creek and a variety of management approaches over the years to protect the watershed.
10:05 a.m. Chris Hermann, Principal, MKSK Studios, outlines the main components of the 2006 Big Darby Accord, identifying future strategies for cross-sector collaboration based on lessons learned in the implementation of the original Accord.
10:20 a.m. Robert Gable, Assistant Chief and Scenic Rivers Program Manager and Heather Doherty, Central Ohio Scenic Rivers Manager, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, showcase preliminary results of the Integrated Prioritization System project, which intends to establish thresholds for 100 potential stressors, including development in the Darby Watershed (Note: thresholds signify the amount of stress the river can accommodate before experiencing ecological damage).
10:45 a.m. City of Hilliard Council Member Cynthia Vermillion shares how Hilliard integrates provisions from the Big Darby Accord into city-led restoration and planning projects.
10:50 a.m. Moderated discussion with panelists. Moderated by Kristy Meyer.
11:15 a.m. Harrison Fried, EPN Program Director, concludes the panel component. Livestreaming service concludes for virtual attendees.
11:20 a.m. Structured networking session for in-person attendees, light snacks provided. Facilitated by Mike McNutt.
12:00 p.m. Boxed to-go lunches are available for in-person attendees; optional space for networking and lunch is available until 1:00 p.m.
What We Heard: Community Perspectives from the Big Darby Networking Session
Question 1: What is your vision for Big Darby Creek (or your home watershed) in 2050?
Ecological Health and Biodiversity
- Biodiversity of today is maintained or improved.
- Mature, protected riparian corridors with clean water and healthy habitat.
- Land around the creek is preserved or restored to support wildlife and ecosystem function.
- Climate‑resilient landscapes (forested/shaded areas, groundwater recharge zones).
Community Engagement and Collaboration
- A community that deeply values the watershed and understands how natural resources are interconnected.
- Strong environmental ethic passed to the next generation; children and adults alike actively involved.
- Increased outdoor recreation (creeking, trails, nature experiences) that builds public appreciation.
- Broad public outreach to help people understand what has gone wrong and how they can help.
Smart Planning and Responsible Development
- Development follows a well‑defined plan emphasizing redevelopment/infill over expansion.
- A “plan with teeth” (i.e., that has clear rules, accountability, and enforceability).
- Incentives for landowners to preserve ecological values.
- Big Darby recognized nationally as a model for multi‑stakeholder watershed planning.
- Jurisdictions cooperate to determine a sustainable development footprint and commit to staying below it.
Economic Recognition of Natural Value
- Ecosystem services and economic benefits of the watershed clearly communicated to decision‑makers.
- Recreation, natural beauty, and preserved landscapes support a thriving local economy.
Question 2: What are barriers to Protecting Watershed Integrity While Meeting Human Progress Needs?
Governance, Enforcement and Coordination Challenges
- Insufficient administrative power to enforce regulations or share expertise across jurisdictions.
- Lack of “teeth” in current plans means there are few consequences for noncompliance.
- Difficulty breaking from traditional development norms and systems.
Knowledge Gaps & Ecological Understanding
- Incomplete understanding of biophysical thresholds and drivers of ecological decline.
- Missing early‑warning indicators (“no canary in the coal mine”).
Economic & Development Pressure
- Rising property values, population growth, and market demand for new housing.
- Strong political pressure to create affordable housing, even when new builds are not always affordable.
- Desire for personal space/homeownership driving expansion over infill.
Cultural and Social Barriers
- Lack of awareness or appreciation of the watershed’s value, especially without charismatic species to generate interest.
- Low adoption of pro‑environmental behaviors on private land due to limited personal connection or incentives.
- Short‑term thinking that prioritizes immediate economic gain over long‑term ecosystem health.
Infrastructure & Transportation Constraints
- Transportation patterns that reinforce sprawl.
- Need for updated infrastructure strategies and innovative development models.
Question 3: What are Indicators of Success/Failure of the Accord? And what are Strategies to Balance Conservation and Development?
Indicators of Success
- The existence and active use of a comprehensive watershed plan.
- Maintaining or improving biodiversity, species richness, and water quality.
- Expanded participation in the Accord by additional municipalities (highly important).
- Consistent adherence to pre‑planned limits (e.g., sanitary sewer boundaries).
- Guaranteed, stable funding and incentives supporting ongoing protection work.
- Collaborative relationships with developers who plan responsibly within the watershed.
Indicators of Failure
- Slippage from agreed‑upon development provisions.
- Piecemeal or inconsistent implementation of open‑space requirements.
- Continued loss of ecological health despite planning efforts.
Strategies for Balancing Development and Conservation
- Identify ecological thresholds and commit to staying within them (use Integrated Prioritization System data to guide management).
- Municipalities adopt aligned zoning, incentives, and development standards.
- Strengthen mitigation frameworks to include land use, forest cover, and impervious surface reduction.
- Improve cultural norms around water protection across the watershed.
- Create a large, coordinated master plan involving more stakeholders and financial mechanisms.
- Prioritize redevelopment and infill instead of expansion/annexation.
- Clearly define open space requirements and develop a prioritization plan for protection types.